Can existing laws keep up with new technology?

In 2018, a landmark ‘cyborg’ case in NSW highlighted how new technology can challenge existing laws. 

The case involved Biohacker Meow-Ludo Disco Gamma Meow Meow who used an Opal card chip implanted under his skin to tap on and off Sydney’s train network. 

Although the chip held a valid balance, he was initially fined for travelling without a valid ticket on the basis that the implant did not meet the technical requirements of a ‘ticket’ under existing transport laws. The issue wasn’t intent or payment, but whether the law recognised how the technology was used. 

On appeal, the court overturned the conviction, acknowledging the unusual circumstances and the low seriousness of the offence. The case highlighted how laws drafted for everyday situations are sometimes stretched to accommodate emerging technologies. 

At Aubrey Brown Lawyers, we help clients navigate situations where changing circumstances don’t fit neatly within existing rules. Clear advice early can help avoid assumptions that don’t hold up when tested. 

Talk to our team on (02) 4350 3333 or by visiting aubreybrown.com.au.

Share this post

BLOG

Recent posts

When a business partner's divorce becomes your problem

Why standard shareholder agreements don't protect you under Australian law There is a significant gap in how most Australian business...

Read Article

Employment Law: five unintentional risks

In our experience, most employment law issues do not arise from deliberate non-compliance. They develop gradually, through practical decisions made...

Read Article

Directors’ duties: oversight, accountability and managing business risk

Company directors play a central role in guiding the direction of a business. Along with that authority comes a range...

Read Article

We acknowledge and respect the traditional owners of the land on which we live and work, the Guringai and Darkinjung people.
We pay our respects to Elders past, present and emerging.